Sifuna Ouster Linked to State House Plot, Senators Claim

They allege the decision was carefully planned during a meeting at State House involving President William Ruto and certain ODM leaders. The changes were later pushed through a quickly organized parliamentary group session, raising questions about fairness and independence. This move has sparked fresh debate over political interference in legislative affairs.

Senators like Dan Maanzo and others voiced their concerns at a press briefing, claiming some leaders openly discussed a lunch meeting with the President where Sifuna’s removal was decided. They argue the process was rushed and unlawful, aimed at silencing strong dissenting voices within the opposition. Machakos Senator Agnes Kavindu highlighted the short notice given for the meeting, questioning its urgency and inclusivity for all members. The faction insists that those in government arrangements should step aside from opposition roles to maintain clear lines.

Busia Senator Okiya Omtatah described the leadership shift as an attempt to weaken the Senate’s oversight functions, warning it could turn the House into an extension of the executive. The group plans to pursue legal and political steps to challenge the new appointments, including that of Migori Senator Eddy Oketch. Kisii Senator Richard Onyonka defended Sifuna, suggesting his firm stance against certain government policies led to his ouster. Critics fear this signals a drift toward reduced multiparty accountability.

In response, Sifuna thanked colleagues for their support during his time in the role and congratulated his successor. The controversy underscores ongoing tensions within opposition ranks amid broader political realignments. As debates continue, many are watching how these changes will affect the balance of power and independence in Parliament. The episode highlights the complex dynamics shaping Kenya’s political landscape ahead of future contests.